New Jersey Debt Collector Drops $43,386 Suit at Trial

by Brian Shaw on December 10, 2011 · 7 comments

debt collector

A debt buyer must prove a debt

First National Acceptance Co., LLC, (FNAC), a New Jersey debt collector represented by attorneys for Hayt, Hayt & Landau, LLC (HHL), suddenly dropped its $43,386.32 lawsuit over an alleged consumer debt at trial on the record in the Superior Court of New Jersey.  The lawsuit alleged that FNAC, a debt buyer of old defaulted consumer loans, purchased the debt from a bank.

The consumer defended herself for a number of years prior to retaining her own lawyer.  During the seven-year battle between the consumer and FNAC’s attorneys, the consumer had successfully opened a default judgment against her.  She then hired the Consumer Litigation Group to represent her.

The matter was quickly scheduled for trial.  Five days before trial, HHL attempted to postpone the trial without success.  “When the time came to show its hand at trial, FNAC was clearly light on proof,” said Brian T. Shaw, the attorney who defended the consumer.  “One would think, given the alleged value of the case, FNAC would have come prepared to prove its case,” said Shaw who regularly represents consumers in debt-related matters.  Instead, FNAC opted to drop the case in exchange for the consumer’s promise not to pursue a lawsuit against it for any violations of consumer rights.

“When strangers call claiming that you owe them money, or worse yet, tell a court that you owe them money, you should not take their word but demand proof,” the consumer’s attorney said.

Pennsylvania and New Jersey consumers who believe their fair debt collection rights have been violated are invited to click here for a no-obligation assessment of their consumer law matter.

  • Guest

    I sure wish Hayt, Hayt & Landau dropped its suit against me.  Didn’t have a lawyer :(

  • Anonymous

    7 years seriously and then they just dropped it? Well it’s good for the consumer that they dropped it. You would think that there was something that could be done for having to fight this for 7 years! Shame on FNAC for not having the proof to begin with!

  • Mimsey

    Imagine the undue stress this consumer underwent having a lawsuit dragged on for seven years with this debt collection agency. That they dropped the lawsuit shortly before they had to present their evidence at trial shows they didn’t have much of a case to start with. The consumer suffered needlessly.

  • Sean

    What happens though when you do demand proof and they supply nothing? Is hiring a lawyer the only option? I would think there needs to be some type of law in place that forces people to turn over this information without a court order.

  • Anonymous

    Maybenot, your are right.  Far too often, debt collectors go to court with flimsy evidence, if any, and hope for a quick default judgment. 

  • sellmore

    Holy cow!  I can’t believe that dragged out for seven years before being dropped.  That’s insane.  No wonder the courts are so backed up.

  • Maybenot

    This is all the more reason to keep up with whom consumers owe their money to and with whom they do business. The fact that this New Jersey debt collector dropped its lawsuit because it didn’t have enough substance says a lot.

Previous post:

Next post: